A square-metre price is comparable only when area definition, substrate condition, coating system, coat count, access, tools, protection, materials and outcome align. Daily and package pricing allocate risk differently.

How to assess this decision in practice

Measure net areas and details consistently, then record height, openings, access, colour count, substrate condition and sensitive areas. Two square-metre rates are not comparable when one covers application only and the other includes repair and protection.

Daily work gives flexibility for evolving conditions but needs routine targets and controls. A package gives better certainty when scope, quantity, system, outcome, change rules and responsibilities are measurable.

What to check

Use this list as a starting point. The depth of review should still match the project stage, decision value, documents and risks.

  1. Measure and separate walls, ceilings, facades, timber, metal, openings, details and height.
  2. Classify new surfaces, light repainting, peeling, damp, cracks, mould or major repair.
  3. Define the system, brand or specification, colours, coat count, primer, filler and supporting materials.
  4. Separate labour, materials, tools, access equipment, protection, mobilisation, cleaning and night work.
  5. Compare daily targets or package outputs, inspections, touch-ups, defects, leftovers and warranty.

Turn the review into a recorded decision

  1. Set the baseline: documents, conditions, dates, parties, reviewed areas and access limitations.
  2. Separate observed facts, third-party statements, assumptions, risks and professional opinions.
  3. For each issue, define the required decision, authority, action owner, target and closure evidence.
  4. Retain document versions and approvals so later changes can be compared against the correct basis.

Questions before deciding

A useful answer should be traceable to documents, site conditions, a responsible party or a clearly stated assumption boundary.

  • What is included and excluded from the price?
  • How are extra quantities or concealed conditions valued?
  • Who supplies and protects materials, tools, access equipment and protection?

How to document the outcome

Record information sources, review dates, documents read, people interviewed, inaccessible conditions, key findings, decisions, owners and follow-up deadlines. Separate facts, third-party statements, assumptions and recommendations.

For legal, structural, geotechnical, tax, permitting, land, design or specialist-testing decisions, use appropriately authorised and qualified professionals.

Information boundary

This article is general educational guidance. Project, contract, land, building and legal conditions vary and may require a specific review.