A sound handover separates visual inspection, functional testing, documents, incomplete work and follow-up. Each defect should have a location, evidence, owner, deadline and verification status.
How to assess this decision in practice
Separate incomplete work from defects. Incomplete work is contracted scope not yet delivered; a defect is delivered work that does not meet its reference. The distinction helps set priority, responsibility and the effect on final payment.
Testing should follow the system and safe conditions. Record equipment, initial state, test steps, results, attendees and review limits. Electrical, structural, gas, lift, fire-protection and specialist systems require appropriately authorised technicians and professionals.
What to check
Use this list as a starting point. The depth of review should still match the project stage, decision value, documents and risks.
- Inspect finishes room by room under suitable lighting.
- Function-test electrical, plumbing, AC, pumps, drainage, doors, locks and equipment.
- Review water-sensitive areas such as roofs, bathrooms, balconies, pools and landscape.
- Collect final drawings, manuals, warranties, test results, material lists and vendor contacts.
- Verify rectification on site before closing a defect.
Turn the review into a recorded decision
- Set the baseline: documents, conditions, dates, parties, reviewed areas and access limitations.
- Separate observed facts, third-party statements, assumptions, risks and professional opinions.
- For each issue, define the required decision, authority, action owner, target and closure evidence.
- Retain document versions and approvals so later changes can be compared against the correct basis.
Questions before deciding
A useful answer should be traceable to documents, site conditions, a responsible party or a clearly stated assumption boundary.
- What is the acceptance criterion for each system?
- Who closes each defect and who verifies it?
- Which documents are required before final payment?
How to document the outcome
Record information sources, review dates, documents read, people interviewed, inaccessible conditions, key findings, decisions, owners and follow-up deadlines. Separate facts, third-party statements, assumptions and recommendations.
For legal, structural, geotechnical, tax, permitting, land, design or specialist-testing decisions, use appropriately authorised and qualified professionals.
This article is general educational guidance. Project, contract, land, building and legal conditions vary and may require a specific review.
